Hi, thanks for the feedback. Maybe it wasn’t the proper term but what I meant was that it was a lion’s share by a small margin, in this case by one person. So imagine there were three slates, 15 votes: Slate 1 gets 6, Slate 2 gets 5, Slate 3 gets 4. Slate 1 would have a “small lion’s share.” And then if you had the same but the votes split Slate 1 gets 7, Slate 2 gets 4, Slate 3 gets 4, it’d be a larger lion’s share but still not large enough to be a majority. Again, not sure if that’s the proper term but that’s what I was trying to say!